View Full
Print-Friendly Version
|
|||||
|
V * O * T * E Ever stop to think about all those holiday cards? Millions are sent each year to deliver a personal message. My company has done this as well for many years… until now. We decided instead to develop a ‘Vote Card’ this year. The card is meant to inspire people everywhere to get out and vote for their candidate in this important Presidential election. We believe so strongly in this message that we had our entire staff join in for a team photo with the Vote message. Until next month, take the time to vote on November 4th. It will make a difference.
Elizabeth Z. Bartz |
|
||||
|
Last Minute Campaign Contributions: As the November 4th election nears, you need to take extra care to ensure your contributions comply with all applicable laws and that you are filing all required reports. There are several important issues to consider when making contributions close to an election. Some jurisdictions have contribution bans close to elections. For example, Florida does not allow PACs to expend or obligate contributions received within five days of an election, nor are candidates allowed to accept contributions within five days of an election, unless the candidate is running unopposed. Tennessee does not allow non-party PACs to make contributions to candidates within 10 days preceding the election. Another consideration is the reports due near elections. Many jurisdictions have increased reporting requirements near elections. For example, once the registration threshold is met, Georgia requires additional reports six days before run-off elections and 15 days before special elections. Maine requires PAC reports to be filed 11 days before an election. These are just two examples – this is a common requirement, so be sure you know what reports are due. Post-election reports are also quite common, so don’t relax just because the election has passed! Finally, some jurisdictions require immediate reporting of certain contributions made in the period leading up to the election. Turnaround time on the reports is typically 24 to 48 hours. California and Washington are two examples with such reporting requirements. Consider making contributions before the “late contribution” reporting period begins to avoid this requirement altogether. If you do give, be sure you know what reporting obligations you have and be sure to have your report ready to go. |
|||||
|
You Should Know
Executive Order
#117 expands the definition of “business entity” as it is applied to
pay-to-play laws with the purpose of tightening coverage of the
current ban on state contractor contributions. In addition, the
order extends
Executive Order
#118 effectively extends the current pay-to-play restrictions on
state contractors to redevelopers and consultants entering into
redevelopment agreements with the state. The order will ban certain
contributions from such entities as well as implement at the time of
contracting a reporting requirement to state redevelopment entities
of all contributions made to political organizations organized under
section 527 of the Internal Revenue Code in the prior four years.
This order is effective Executive Order #119 creates a task force comprised of 11 individuals with expertise in local governance, local government ethics, and the procurement of goods and services by local units to be appointed by the governor with recommendation of various members of the state legislature. The task force is charged with making recommendations on whether local government ethics law should be amended to match state conflict of interest law and to consider how to implement a training and compliance program for local ethics. This order became effective immediately.
Executive Order
#120 updates a previous financial disclosure executive order. Corzine’s plan of attack issued to the legislature includes a number of broad, sweeping ethics reforms. Proposed pay-to-play reforms include codifying the executive orders, extending state law to all county and municipal governments and authorities, expanding application to cover contributions by school district contractors and contractors for legislatively created regional utility authorities, and banning contributions by audit firms and partners to audit clients. The legislative initiative is also aimed at restricting “wheeling,” the practice of party committees making unlimited contributions to candidates, other party committees, and PACs. Under Corzine’s plan, state committees, legislative leadership committees, county committees, and municipal committees would be subject to more rigid regulation. The plan also calls for greater disclosure for political advertising, more competitive local contracting, stronger public official financial disclosure laws, prohibition of the use of state grant funds for hiring lobbyists, and granting the Election Law Enforcement Commission the power to penalize late campaign finance reporting and other election law violations.
For Pets Sake ... Meet Buckeye
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
Landmark Series This article is one of an ongoing series that focuses on historical and/or significant landmarks. Information gleaned from cbbt.com.
You can find these at the Chesapeake Bay Bridge-Tunnel.
In 1964, the
Chesapeake Bay Bridge-Tunnel began its service providing a direct
link between southeastern Virginia and the Delmarva Peninsula
(Delaware plus the Eastern Shore counties in Maryland and Virginia.)
Distinguished as "The Outstanding Civil Engineering Achievement" by the American Society of Civil Engineers, and selected in 1964 as one of the “Seven Engineering Wonders of the Modern World", the bridge-tunnel has provided an important East Coast travel convenience. To meet additional traffic demands and provide for a safer crossing, the 2nd phase of construction creating a parallel crossing was completed in 1999. The production of the new span was as challenging as the construction of the original span. This project, again, drew focus to its remarkable triumph in engineering and construction. Each phase of construction cost $200 million dollars. The funds were gathered from cashing in revenue bonds. No local, state or federal tax monies were used for construction costs. |
|||||
From the State and Federal Communications Scrapbook
|
|||||
Canadian Compliance for US Companies
|
|||||
|
See Us in Person
Plan to say hello at future professional development events where
State and Federal Communications
COMPLIANCE
NOW is published for our customers and friends. State and
Federal Communications, Inc. | Courtyard Square | 80 South
Summit St., Suite 100 | Akron, OH 44308 |
|